Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Prism cube black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, with a score of 90.8 against 81.9. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison review, Galaxy A51 5G's body is noticeably older, just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A51 5G has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14.
Galaxy A51 5G features a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixel count per inch in the screen and a slightly higher 1256 x 2760 resolution.
The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A51 5G, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a larger diafragm aperture, a more megapixels camera and a much bigger sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.