Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 is better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having a overall score of 90.7 against 81.9. Galaxy A52 is a better cellphone than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, it must be noted that it is also way older, a bit heavier and a little bit thicker. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with an incredibly better screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher 1256 x 2760 resolution and a bit higher pixels density.
The Galaxy A52 has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy A52 features more memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 features a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a camera with way more MP. Galaxy A52 features just a little better battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.