Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is much better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 score. These phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version. Even being the best we compare here, we must note that it is also a incredibly older, just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier phone.
Galaxy A52 5G has a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels and a quite better amount of pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a quite bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photographs, and they both have the same video frame rate, the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a camera with a way higher resolution.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit superior battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4310mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.