Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having a 91.1 score against 81.9. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A52s has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version. Even being the best we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy A52s construction is way older, a little heavier and a little bit thicker than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo.
Galaxy A52s has a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a way better looking screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater pixels number in each display inch and a quite better resolution of 1256 x 2760px.
Galaxy A52s counts with a quite bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52s counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A52s shoots clearer photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A52s also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.