Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a general score of 81.9, which is slightly better than Galaxy A7 (2017)'s 75.8 score. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's construction is extremely newer and just a little bit lighter, but a little thicker than Galaxy A7 (2017). The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better screen than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a quite better screen pixel density, a better resolution of 1256 x 2760 and a little bit larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017) features a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a larger diafragm aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited situations, a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a lot higher video quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features greater battery duration than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.