Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-29 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A70's 76.9 global score. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo body is notably newer and a little bit lighter than Galaxy A70's, but it's a little bit thicker. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has 14 version while Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version, so it offers a couple additional features.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a way better display than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels and a little more pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a slightly bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy A70 counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo captures greater photos and videos than Galaxy A70, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs or videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a way bigger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.