Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 474 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having a 92.9 score against 81.9. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW's body is incredibly older, a bit heavier and a bit thicker than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has the previous 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much sharper screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixels amount in each inch in the screen and a quite better resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels. Galaxy A71 5G UW has a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both have 8 CPU cores and the same RAM amount.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a tinier camera sensor capturing less light and duller colors, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the same video frame rate and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a better memory for applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 4% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.