Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A9 (2018) has a score of 85.2, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 general score. Galaxy A9 (2018) is an extremely older and a little bit heavier cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but Samsung managed to build it just a little thinner anyway. The Galaxy A9 (2018) counts with a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a little bit larger display, a better resolution of 1256 x 2760px and a quite greater display pixel density. Galaxy A9 (2018) has a slightly bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a better camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a much more MP camera in the back and a way larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a 13% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.