Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2024-08-29 | -- |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 320.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 11 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 3.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, getting an 81.9 score against 76.3. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has older 14 version while Samsung Galaxy Alpha has Android 4.4.4 version. Although it's the best we are comparing, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo body is extremely heavier and thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Alpha.
Galaxy Alpha features a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an extra GPU. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a way better display than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a really bigger display, way more pixels per screen inch and a way higher resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a much higher resolution back-facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a very superior memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Alpha, because it has 224 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 4310mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.