Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having an 85.2 score against 81.9. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy F41 has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version. The Galaxy F41 is a older, heavier and just a little thicker phone than Motorola Edge 50 Neo.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy F41, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a slightly higher resolution of 1256 x 2760, much more brightness and a just a little better number of pixels per display inch.
Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Galaxy F41 takes a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a tinier sensor taking lower quality pictures, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy F41 also counts with a camera with a much better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy F41, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy F41 counts with a superior battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.