Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 474 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having a score of 88.1 against 81.9. Galaxy F62 is a way older, thicker and a lot heavier cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy F62 has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and 2 GB less RAM. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better looking screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher 1256 x 2760 resolution, a just a bit greater display pixels density and a really brighter screen.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor shooting worse quality photos, and they both have the same video resolution, the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 62 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.