Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-29 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, with a 97.6 score against 81.9. Both devices in this comparison review include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version, giving you some nice extra features. Although the Galaxy Fold is noticeably older and a lot heavier than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, it's body is still somewhat thinner.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1256 x 2760 and a better pixels density. The Galaxy Fold has a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has lower video frame rate and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels and a lot bigger sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs and videos.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much better storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Fold has a bit better battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.