Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2024-08-29 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 474 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an overall score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy M20's global score of 78.9. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo construction is newer, a bit lighter and just a little thinner than the Samsung Galaxy M20. Both devices in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has newer 14 version and Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10 version, so it counts with some additional features and performance enhancements.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy M20, because it has a little better pixels number per inch of display, a bit higher resolution of 1256 x 2760 and a little bit bigger display. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has more memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy M20 counts with a much more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M20, because it has a back-facing camera with way more megapixels, a bigger camera aperture, a way better (4K) video resolution and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality pictures and videos.
Galaxy M20 features improved battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4310mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.