Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-29 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 474 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M40 has a general score of 85, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 global score. Even though Samsung Galaxy M40 is extremely older than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, it's body is just a little thinner and a bit lighter. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy M40 has the previous 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version.
Galaxy M40 features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy M40, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a slightly better 1256 x 2760 pixels resolution and a just a little higher count of pixels in each display inch.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy M40, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for taking photos or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos and a way more mega pixels back camera.
Samsung Galaxy M40 counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has improved battery life than Galaxy M40, because it has a 4310mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.