Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 474 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having an 87.7 score against 81.9. Even though the Samsung Galaxy M51 is a better device than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, it must be told that it's also noticeably older, thicker and somewhat heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M51 has 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14.
The Galaxy M51 has a much faster processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a lot better screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1256 x 2760 resolution and a just a little higher pixel density.
Galaxy M51 features a slightly better memory to install games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy M51 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 62% bigger battery size.
Samsung Galaxy M51 takes a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a tinier sensor taking worse quality photographs and videos, and they both have the same video definition, the same camera aperture and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also counts with a way higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.