Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 474 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo's overall score of 81.9. Although it's the best in this review, it must be told that it is also a lot older, somewhat heavier and a bit thicker. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. They have 8 CPU cores and a 8 GB RAM memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher 1256 x 2760 resolution and a just a little more pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 and Motorola Edge 50 Neo have incredibly similar battery performance, although the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has 4300mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better camera than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has faster 30 frames per second video frame rates, a much more mega-pixels camera and a bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.