Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, getting a overall score of 98.9 against 81.9. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra design has the same thickness than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but it is somewhat heavier. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 13 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a little bit worse resolution of 1256 x 2760, a bit smaller screen and a quite worse display density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 4 percent greater battery size.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a lot higher video quality and a back camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.