Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note 3's 81.2 global score. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's body is newer and a little bit thinner than Galaxy Note 3's, although it's a little bit heavier. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has newer 14 version while Galaxy Note 3 has Android 5.0 version, providing a couple additional features.
The Galaxy Note 3 has a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 5 GB lesser RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with an additional GPU. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has a bit bigger screen, a better 1256 x 2760 resolution and a little higher screen pixel density.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a back camera with lot more mega-pixels, a way bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better storage for applications and games than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features superior battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 35% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.