Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.2 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an overall score of 81.9, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5's 79.3 global score. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo design weights the same than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5, but it's just a bit thicker. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy Note 5 has Android 5.1 version, providing the user some extra features and performance enhancements.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a little bit worse 1256 x 2760 resolution and a just a bit worse number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit larger display. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Note 5 features a much better performing CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has less cpu cores and lesser RAM. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a larger camera aperture for better low-light photos and videos, a back-facing camera with way more MP and a much bigger sensor taking much higher quality photographs.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.