Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting an 81.9 score against 80.4. Even though the Motorola Edge 50 Neo is notably newer than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, it is just a little thicker and a little heavier. Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a quite inferior pixels quantity per inch of display and a little lower resolution of 1256 x 2760px, it also counts with a quite larger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photography, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a back camera with a lot better resolution and a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality pictures.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 4310mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.