Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having a overall score of 89 against 81.9. The Galaxy Note10 is an older device than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but it is just a little bit lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a better 1256 x 2760 resolution, a bit larger screen and a just a bit higher count of pixels per inch of screen.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a much faster CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. They have a 8 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. Galaxy Note10 features as much storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, both have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo captures better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features greater battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.