Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a general score of 86.2, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 general score. Despite being the best in this comparison review, we must highlight that it is also a incredibly older, somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker cellphone. Both phones in this review use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much more vibrant display than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1256 x 2760px and a little higher display density. The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with an extremely better CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with more memory to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a superior camera than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light images and video, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a camera with a much better resolution.
Galaxy Note10 Lite has just a bit longer battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 4 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.