Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note3, getting a global score of 81.9 against 77.7. Although Motorola Edge 50 Neo is just a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, it's just a little thinner and notably newer. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an older 14 version and Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much sharper display than Galaxy Note3, because it has a little higher pixels amount in each inch in the screen, a better 1256 x 2760 resolution and a little larger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage.
Galaxy Note3 has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 4 lesser CPU cores and a lower amount of RAM. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has improved battery life than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 35% larger battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo shoots way better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a way higher resolution back-facing camera, a lot bigger camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.