Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a bit better than Galaxy Note7, having a global score of 81.9 against 79.5. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo design is noticeably newer than the Galaxy Note7's, but it's a bit thicker and just a bit heavier. Galaxy Note7 features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better screen than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a little bit lower 1256 x 2760 resolution and a just a little worse pixel number in each display inch, it also counts with a quite bigger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or videos in low light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a much larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features superior battery duration than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 4310mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.