Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-29 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 global score. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy S10 has the previous 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14. The Galaxy S10 body is just a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a bit lower 1256 x 2760 resolution and a little worse pixel number per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit larger display. Galaxy S10 has a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light captures and video and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a way bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a bit more memory for applications and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has greater battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has a 4310mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.