Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-29 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 5G has a score of 93.6, which is much better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's general score of 81.9. The Galaxy S10 5G is a older and somewhat heavier phone than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but Samsung made it a little bit thinner anyway. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S10 5G has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, although it has a just a little worse pixel density, a bit lower 1256 x 2760 pixels resolution and a little smaller display. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has as much storage capacity to install applications and games as the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, both of them have equal internal memory.
Galaxy S10 5G has an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both have a 8 GB RAM and 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing photographs or videos in poorly lited environments and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a camera in the back with a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution and a much bigger back camera sensor taking way better quality videos and pictures.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.