Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 474 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite has a score of 89.7, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 score. The Galaxy S10 Lite construction has the same thickness than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but it's a bit heavier. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1256 x 2760px resolution and a bit greater screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both have 8 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a way smaller sensor capturing much worse quality pictures, a worse 3840x2160 video resolution, a lower 48 megapixels resolution camera and a tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs in poorly lited environments.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit better battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 4% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.