Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 has a global score of 94.8, which is better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo's general score of 81.9. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 has 13 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version. Although the Galaxy S20 is notably older than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, it's body is just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner.
Samsung Galaxy S20 counts with a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has more RAM memory. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy S20, because although it has a quite lower screen pixels density and a bit lower 1256 x 2760 resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S20, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy S20, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a lot higher resolution back camera, higher 30 frames per second video frame rate and a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.