Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Cloud lavender, Cloud mint, Cloud navy, Cloud orange, Cloud red and Cloud white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 509.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, with a general score of 90.8 against 81.9. These devices come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14. Even being the best phone in this review, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE is a incredibly older, just a little thicker and somewhat heavier phone than Motorola Edge 50 Neo.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel quantity in each screen inch and a little bit higher 1256 x 2760 resolution. Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S20 FE, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and a same size camera aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE counts with a quite bigger memory for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 FE counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4310mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.