Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having a score of 98 against 81.9. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has an older 13 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a way older, heavier and just a bit thicker phone than Motorola Edge 50 Neo.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a better looking screen than Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G, although it has a just a bit worse display pixel density, a little bit worse resolution of 1256 x 2760 and a little bit smaller display. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a way smaller camera sensor providing a much worse image quality, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also counts with a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a way more MP camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G counts with a bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4310mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.