Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 93.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 5.75 x 2.78 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Green, Phantom Black, Pink Gold and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 1500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Multi-touch |
| 10.2 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 3000 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 is better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having a 93.4 score against 81.9. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 has 13 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14. Even though the Galaxy S22 is way older than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, it's construction is just a bit lighter and a little bit thinner.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 has a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S22, because it has a quite better quantity of pixels per inch of screen, a slightly better resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels, a little bit larger display and much more display brightness.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S22, because it has a 16% greater battery capacity.
Galaxy S22 has a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have a 50 megapixels camera and the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 also counts with a lot higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.