Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 global score. Both phones we compare here include Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has older 13 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14. Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is noticeably older, just a bit thicker and noticeably heavier than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1256 x 2760, a little worse screen pixel density and a quite smaller display, it also counts with much more brightness. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has more internal storage.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much higher 108 megapixels resolution camera, a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way higher video resolution.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has superior battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.