Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-08-29 | -- |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 6.03 ounces | -- |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 has a score of 82.6, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 score. Both devices in this comparison review come with the same Android 14 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that. The Galaxy S25 design is way thinner and way lighter than Motorola Edge 50 Neo.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo and Galaxy S25 feature quite similar CPUs, both have 8 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy S25, because it has a little bit more brightness, a slightly higher resolution of 1256 x 2760px, a bit greater quantity of pixels in each display inch and a quite bigger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S25 captures a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a smaller sensor, and they both have the same camera aperture and a same resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also counts with a lot better video definition.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S25, because it has a 4310mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.