Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 14 |
| 2024-08-29 | -- |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | -- |
| 6.03 ounces | -- |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 Ultra is better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having a overall score of 90.7 against 81.9. Galaxy S25 Ultra's construction is notably lighter and extremely thinner than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo. These phones work with the same Android 14 OS. The Galaxy S25 Ultra features a processor that's just as good as the Motorola Edge 50 Neo one, and although the Galaxy S25 Ultra has a higher amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra and Motorola Edge 50 Neo feature very similar screens, because although the Galaxy S25 Ultra has a quite opaque screen, it also counts with a little bigger display, a just a bit greater pixel number per display inch and a little bit higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution. The Galaxy S25 Ultra's storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to the Motorola Edge 50 Neo one, they have equal internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with greater battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 16 percent more battery size. Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a larger camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality, a much more MP back facing camera, a larger camera aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light situations and a way better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.