Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Blue and Red |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.16 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a global score of 81.9, which is slightly better than Galaxy S5 Sport's score of 77.8. These phones use Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Neo has the older 14 version and Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's body is incredibly newer and a little thinner than Galaxy S5 Sport's, but it is a bit heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport features a much powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a better looking display than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a better 1256 x 2760px resolution, a quite better pixels count per inch in the display and a larger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography, a much better resolution camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a superior battery performance than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 54 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.