Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, having an 81.9 score against 75.8. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's body is newer, just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has an inferior number of cores and lesser RAM.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a bit better screen than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of display and a quite lower 1256 x 2760 resolution, it also counts with a bigger display and much more brightness. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and video in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a back-facing camera with a much better 50 MP resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features just a little better battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.