Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2017-04-21 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a bit better than Galaxy S8, with a global score of 81.9 against 81.7. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's design is a lot newer, but just a bit heavier and just a little thicker than the Galaxy S8. Galaxy S8 has a way better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a more vivid display than Galaxy S8, because although it has a quite lower 1256 x 2760px resolution and a just a bit worse pixel density, it also counts with a little bigger display. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photography, and they both have the same (4K) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a back facing camera with lot more MP and a way bigger sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S8, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S8, because it has a 44% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.