Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Gold and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an overall score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy S8 Active's 81.9 global score. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's design is notably newer, thinner and lighter than Galaxy S8 Active. Galaxy S8 Active counts with a much better performing processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a little bit worse 1256 x 2760 resolution and a just a little lower pixel count per inch of screen, it also counts with a little larger screen. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo captures way better photos and videos than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a much larger sensor and a back facing camera with a much higher 50 MP resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.