Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-29 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has a score of 83.3, which is slightly better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 general score. The Galaxy S9 construction is just a bit lighter than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but it's a bit thicker and was released many years before. Galaxy S9 counts with a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a sharper display than Galaxy S9, because although it has a bit worse 1256 x 2760px resolution and a little worse count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger display. Motorola Edge 50 Neo shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution and a way larger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S9, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better battery duration than Galaxy S9, because it has a 44 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.