Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | -- |
| 474 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.77 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a overall score of 81.9 against 80.1. Motorola Edge 50 Neo's design is newer, extremely lighter and a lot thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has the older 14 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a better display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a bit worse resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels, it also counts with a larger display. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with more memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor, a way more megapixels back camera and a much higher video definition.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a little bit longer battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 4% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.