Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 474 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, having a overall score of 81.9 against 81. Both of these devices include Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a more recent 14 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo construction is way newer, incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner than Galaxy XCover Pro.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a quite larger screen, a slightly better resolution of 1256 x 2760px and a bit better pixels amount per inch of display. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a greater memory to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a lot better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 4310mAh battery capacity against 4050mAh.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP, a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.