Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo's overall score of 81.9. Both phones in our current comparison have Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip has the older 12 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version. The Galaxy Z Flip design is somewhat thinner than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but it is just a little bit heavier and was released many years before.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixels count in each screen inch and a little bit higher 1256 x 2760 resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and a 8 GB RAM.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo captures better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a lot more MP back camera.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with as much memory capacity for games and applications as the Motorola Edge 50 Neo one, they have equal internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.