Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 11.77 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, getting an 85.6 score against 81.9. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 is a way older and just a bit heavier device than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but Samsung could make it somewhat thinner anyway.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a lot better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher display pixel density and a quite better resolution of 1256 x 2760 pixels. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. They have a Octa-Core CPU and 8 GB of RAM. Motorola Edge 50 Neo shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a lot more mega-pixels back camera.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo features improved battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 31% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.