Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 general score. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a way older and just a little heavier cellphone than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, but Samsung managed to make it somewhat thinner anyway. Both of these phones have Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip 5G has 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an incredibly better display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1256 x 2760px resolution and a bit greater quantity of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G and Motorola Edge 50 Neo both feature very similar storage to store more apps and games, they have exactly the same 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better camera than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor and a back-facing camera with a lot better 50 mega pixels resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with better battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4310mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.