Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| P-OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo's general score of 81.9. Although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is incredibly older and heavier than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo, it's design is still somewhat thinner. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a quite lower 1256 x 2760 resolution, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per display inch. Galaxy Z Fold 2 and Motorola Edge 50 Neo feature very similar storage to install applications and games, they have equal internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit superior battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4310mAh.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo captures better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality and a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.