Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 14 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2024-08-29 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 474 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a bit better than Xperia XZ2 Compact, getting a general score of 81.9 against 79. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has the older 14 version while Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo. Motorola Edge 50 Neo is a a lot newer and a lot thinner cellphone than the Xperia XZ2 Compact, but it's also a little heavier.
Xperia XZ2 Compact has a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a much better display than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1256 x 2760px, a lot brighter screen and a bigger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has more memory capacity to install applications and games than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much better battery performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 4310mAh battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo captures better photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light photos, a lot bigger camera sensor taking lot better quality pictures and a lot better 50 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.