Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-29 | 2019-03-28 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Black and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has a general score of 82.3, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo's score of 81.9. Despite being the best phone in this comparison, we must note that it's also much older, somewhat heavier and a bit thicker. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has an older 10 version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 counts with a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a much sharper display than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has much more screen brightness, a slightly better 1256 x 2760 resolution and a just a little better count of pixels in each inch in the display.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has 4310mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a back-facing camera with a higher 50 megapixels resolution and a much bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.