Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-29 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Iceberg grey and Shadow black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, having a score of 82.9 against 81.9. Both devices in this review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14. Despite being the best in this comparison review, Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro is a notably older, heavier and a little bit thicker phone than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a way better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a lot brighter display, a slightly higher resolution of 1256 x 2760px and a just a little higher display density.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both have a 8 GB RAM memory and 8 cpu cores.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro features just a bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, although it has a way tinier sensor taking way lower quality videos and pictures, a lower video definition and a back camera with less mega pixels, they both have a F1.8 aperture. Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a bit superior battery performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro, because it has a 4310mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.