Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a general score of 86.6, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's global score of 81.9. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has the previous 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version. Despite being the best phone we are comparing, Xiaomi Black Shark 3's construction is way older, notably thicker and incredibly heavier than Motorola Edge 50 Neo.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo has an incredibly better looking screen than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1256 x 2760 and a bit greater pixels density. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Black Shark 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. They have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 shoots slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality, and they both have a F1.8 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also counts with better 60 fps video frame rates and a way better 64 megapixels resolution camera.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 10% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.