Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-08-29 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana | Blasting black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2760 x 1256 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 474 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| 3000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G615 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 73.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.77 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.16 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a general score of 90.1, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo's 81.9 score. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro is a noticeably older, extremely thicker and a lot heavier cellphone than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both have a 8 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a sharper display than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro, although it has a little lower resolution of 1256 x 2760, a just a bit inferior pixels count in each inch of display and a little smaller display.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo and the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro have very similar storage for games and applications, both of them have exactly the same internal memory. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which gives a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also counts with higher video frame rates and a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.